Return to Freinds Of Desert Hot Springs Home Page 

Updated: March 12, 2006 
We ask the Important questions others are too afraid to ask!

Website Hits 09/05-85,827, 10/05-178,482 11/05-174,413 12/05- 228,894 01/06- 380,232 02/06- 329,935

" POLITICIANS WILL ONLY START SEEING THE LIGHT WHEN THEY BEGIN TO FEEL THE HEAT"

Return to Friends Of Desert Hot Springs Home Page

01/27/06

Mary's Trailer

Did Councilwoman, Mary Stephens email city staff telling them to selectively enforce the code enforcement laws? Did Stephens tell staff to ignore her friends code violations while doubling up code enforcement on her friends competition? Did Jerry Hansen carry out Stephens selective enforcement and discrimination? See Jerry Hansen's initialing (approval) of Stephens email. Is friend of Stephens and current department head of code enforcement, Glenn Roberts still caring out Councilwoman Stephens selective enforcement to this day?See today's photo of the illegally parked trailer still there as it was 18 months ago when Stephens wrote the letter telling staff to ignore this violation. Did Stephens carry out a secret policy of staff ignoring spa owner's code violations as a favor in return for spa owners approving bonds being tied to their own "TOT" (Transient Occupancy Tax)?

Picture taken today of "Mary's Trailer" illegally parked in violation of current code Mary approved.

Click on image for bigger image

Email from Mary Stephens telling staff to ignore code enforcement violations while doubling up code enforcement of their competition.

Click on image to see larger readable image complete with Jerry Hansen's Initials of approval

Mary's Long Time Trailer Story. How Long will code enforcement ignore Mary's Friends Violations.
See 01/27/06 story

Legal stuff here!

Any statements from these letters should be verified prior to being relied upon as being factual. We believe that the information is true when we post it within these letters. Even so, the reader should question and investigate the information provided as to its truth fullness.   Even though we feel that the information is true, no one should rely on any information provided until it is verified as correct.   The views represented within these letters are not necessarily our opinion.

Please Note: We will attempt to correct any information we find to be false. We will not publish any information about a public figure that we "believe" to be "False" or have "actual knowledge of being false". (See Sullivan vs New York Times) Please let us know if you find any additional information regarding any posted statements herein.  The information posted here has had a very high probability of being factually correct.  We have tried to be diligent in our postings as to avoid any "reckless disregard" for the information presented (expanded Sullivan Rule). The letters are provided a "Matter of Public Concern" therefore are "Common Law Privilege" (See Sullivan vs New York Times).  These letters are posted as citizen opinions under the First Amendment Right. In 1974, Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc, 418 U.S. 323 there is no such thing as a false idea.  Even obvious sarcasm is not liable per 1988 ruling in Hustler Magazine v. Falwell 485 U.S. 46. This forum of letters is a constitutional privilege of "neutral reporting" per Edwards v. National Audubon Society.